The Case For Technology in Cricket
Apr 19th, 2011 Posted in Cricket News | No Comments »The use of technology in sports has been the subject of intense debate. The governing bodies of rugby and cricket have acquiesced to the use of technology for purposes of officiating. However, cricket includes technology in a limited way.
Television replays are used for stumping decisions, run outs and boundary calls. Cricket’s reality is that several umpiring errors are highlighted by comprehensive television coverage with cameras at all angles. Therefore, it is no surprise that some quarters are clamouring for the use of technology to assist umpires. On the other side of the continuum, there are those who insist that the status quo should be maintained.
There is the view that increased technology use would make the game of cricket fairer by reducing umpiring errors. To evaluate this, the International Cricket Council experimented with a decision referral system whereby umpires could refer dubious decisions like disputed catches or leg-before-wicket decisions. The results of this have shown that in critical cases, the footage used to examine decisions sometimes provides inconclusive evidence.
Cricket purists advanced the notion that increased technology use would make the game of cricket more protracted. This seems to be a moot point, since minutes are wasted replaying a boundary call that would be a matter of a couple runs. The technology advocates suggests that it is better to spend this time determining if a batsman is out or not out. If purists are thinking about the game-length, then they’ll address the problem with over-rates.
Purists argue that the human element is and should remain an integral aspect of the game. They opine that everyone makes mistakes and that cricket is a microcosm of life. Therefore, unfair decisions give teams the chance to demonstrate character.
The counter-argument is that viewers and supporters don’t want to see a microcosm of life. They want to see a match-up of skills, not umpiring decisions that adversely affect a team’s fortunes. For the less-passionate fans, it seems a pyrrhic victory if obtained by a glaring umpiring error.
The series that the West Indies won against Pakistan in the year 2000 is a good example. The West Indians were nine wickets down and about to lose the series. Then not one, but two umpiring errors ensured that they won the series based on one undeserved win. As a West Indian supporter and the victory certainly felt hollow to me.
Undeniably, the role of the umpire will be affected by the increase of technology. The nature of that change will be subject to debate. There is the view that the umpire’s role and authority will be undermined by increased use of technology. However, this is yet another moot point, since umpires are made to look foolish (via replays) each time they make an error. This is exacerbated when the cameras focus on them for a few seconds after the commentators denounce the decision as “atrocious” or “a shocker”.
The entire technology debate is useless. What the ICC should forbid is the constant replays that place too much emphasis on umpiring errors. The fact is that umpires make few errors, but TV coverage and the way the human mind works makes them appear as buffoons who can’t see very well.
The television viewers are privy to the analysis provided by “Hawkeye” or “Hot Spot” and the benefit of several replays. The ICC must decide to either continue to allow the over-examination of umpiring decisions or discontinue it. If decisions are going to be scrutinized, then those making it should have the same tools. If this is not the case, the decision should not be scrutinized. After all, many viewers or supporters wait until they see a replay before their emotions go one way or the other.
The law of cricket states that if the umpire is unsure whether a batsman is out, he should give the batsman the benefit of the doubt. The modern umpire is not too interested in giving the benefit of the doubt, because there is a lot of pressure to get the decision correct each time. The ICC needs to make a decision to give umpires some more toys, or take them away from the television and stadium coverage. The game of cricket will be better off for it either way.
Darrell Victor is a freelance writer and cricket enthusiast from the West Indies. For articles on West Indies cricket, read:
Reasons for the decline of West Indies cricket: http://www.helium.com/items/1264594-west-indies-cricket
A West Indian Perspective on Test cricket: http://www.helium.com/items/1258936-test-cricket